LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY OF
MARCH 1, 2006 – QUESTION PERIOD
Mr. Norman W. Sterling (Lanark–Carleton):
I also have a question for the Minister of the Environment. This question
relates to the Carp landfill site, in the west part of
Interjections.
Mr. Sterling: This is a
very serious matter for my constituents, and the people of Stittsville, in
particular, in Mr. Baird’s riding. Over the past 20 years, the population of
this area has exploded. Many, many more subdivisions have been approved which
are very, very close to this particular site. In January, this waste management
corporation put forward a proposal to more than double the capacity of this
landfill site to provide landfill room for
Hon. Laurel C. Broten (Minister of the Environment):
I want to assure the member that I take the issues that are being raised in this
community very seriously. I understand that, at present, the company has
expressed its desire to complete an individual EA for its proposal to expand the
landfill. My ministry believes that the size of the company’s proposed
expansion would warrant an individual EA. To proceed with an individual EA, we
will have to have terms of reference and opportunity for the community to come
forward and raise a number of important issues. The process is just beginning.
In that process, the community will have an opportunity to raise the many issues
that I understand are currently being raised in the community with respect to
the future of waste management in this area and how they will manage on a
going-forward basis. So I do think it is an important issue. My ministry will be
paying very close attention.
Mr. Sterling: Your
involvement and discretion with regard to what will take place in the future is
greatest at this moment. After May 12, you will be receiving an application to
approve the terms of reference for the environmental assessment to take place.
Mr. Eli El-Chantiry and Janet Stavinga, both councillors in the city of
Hon. Ms. Broten: You’re quite right that I would have to approve the companies terms of reference for the individual EA before it would begin. For the individual EA to proceed, the company would have to evaluate alternatives to its proposed undertaking—which is what the member is asking for—identify the potential impacts on human health and the natural and socioeconomic environments, demonstrate that it undertook public consultation and identified any concerns, and propose satisfactory solutions to address those concerns. There is nothing which prohibits anyone from seeking the province’s approval with respect to a number of alternatives coming forward. But I do need to be clear, as Minister of the Environment, those alternatives have to be clean, and they can’t discourage the use of waste reduction, reuse and recycling.